Quick answer
- Data verified
- August 29, 2026
- Serious default
- Opus 5, $5 in / $25 out per MTok
- Routine + cost
- Sonnet 5, Intro pricing $2/$10 through Aug 31, 2026
- Hardest work / subagents
- Fable 5 / Haiku 4.5
The current Claude lineup
As of August 29, 2026, Anthropic's current coding lineup runs from the Mythos-class Fable 5 down through the new Opus 5, Sonnet 5, and Haiku 4.5. Opus 5 shipped July 24, 2026 and supersedes Opus 4.8 at the same price, we list 4.8 below for teams that pin it, but new work should default to Opus 5. If a ranking page mentions Sonnet 4.6 as current, it is stale, it was replaced by Sonnet 5 on June 30, 2026.
| Model | Tier | Price | Context | Released | Headline benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | frontier | $10 in / $50 out per MTok | 1M tokens (128k output) | June 9, 2026 | SWE-bench Verified: 95.0% |
| Claude Opus 5 | flagship | $5 in / $25 out per MTok (Fast mode ~2.5x speed at twice the base price) | Not published | July 24, 2026 | Frontier-Bench v0.1: Surpasses all models |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | flagship | $5 in / $25 out per MTok (Fast mode $10/$50) | 1M tokens | May 28, 2026 | SWE-bench Verified: 88.6% |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | workhorse | $3 in / $15 out per MTok (Intro pricing $2/$10 through Aug 31, 2026) | 1M tokens (default) | June 30, 2026 | — |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | fast | $1 in / $5 out per MTok | 200k tokens | October 2025 | — |
Benchmark scores above come from the sources named in each cell's benchmark, primarily the swebench.com leaderboard, re-checked on the verification date. Anthropic has not yet published comparable benchmark suites for Sonnet 5 and Haiku 4.5, so we show none rather than inventing them.
Model by model: strengths, trade-offs, best for
Claude Fable 5
frontierAnthropic's most capable generally available model, the first of the new Mythos-class tier above Opus.
- · Best published SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro scores of any generally available model
- · Adaptive thinking always on, plans long multi-step work without babysitting
- · 1M-token context holds a large repo plus specs in a single session
- · 2x Opus 4.8's price per token, overkill for routine edits
- · Not Claude Code's default, you must select it explicitly
- · Unavailable under zero-data-retention agreements
- · Hard, cross-cutting refactors and architecture work
- · Long autonomous runs where re-prompting is expensive
- · Spec drafting and review on large codebases
Benchmarks: SWE-bench Verified 95.0% (swebench.com leaderboard) · SWE-bench Pro 80.3% (Anthropic / Scale leaderboard), verified August 29, 2026.
Claude Opus 5
flagshipAnthropic's new value flagship: near-Fable-5 intelligence at the same $5/$25 price as Opus 4.8, with adjustable effort.
- · Approaches Fable 5's intelligence at a fraction of the cost per task (Anthropic)
- · Same $5/$25 pricing as Opus 4.8 with greatly improved performance
- · Adjustable effort: dial up intelligence or conserve tokens for cheaper, faster runs
- · Anthropic has not published a context-window figure
- · Still behind Mythos 5 on cybersecurity-exploitation tasks
- · Fable 5 stays marginally ahead at the very top on some benchmarks
- · Everyday complex agentic coding, now the default Opus
- · Cost-sensitive work that still wants near-frontier quality
- · Long autonomous runs with effort tuned to the task
Benchmarks: Frontier-Bench v0.1 Surpasses all models (Anthropic launch materials) · CursorBench 3.2 Within 0.5% of Fable 5 (Anthropic launch materials) · ARC-AGI 3 3x the next-best model (Anthropic launch materials) · OSWorld 2.0 Beats Fable 5's best (Anthropic launch materials), verified August 29, 2026.
Claude Opus 4.8
flagshipThe previous flagship workhorse for complex agentic coding, superseded by Opus 5 at the same $5/$25 price.
- · Strongest price-to-capability ratio for hard coding tasks
- · Effort defaults to high, thorough on multi-file changes
- · Half Fable 5's price with most of the capability
- · Superseded by Opus 5, which Anthropic reports beats it at the same price
- · Fable 5 measurably ahead on the hardest benchmarks
- · Slower than Sonnet on quick iterations
- · Day-to-day feature implementation on real codebases
- · Complex agentic coding sessions
- · Code review passes on big diffs
Benchmarks: SWE-bench Verified 88.6% (swebench.com leaderboard) · SWE-bench Pro 69.2% (Scale leaderboard), verified August 29, 2026.
Claude Sonnet 5
workhorseThe new mid-tier default: 1M context standard, new tokenizer, replaces Sonnet 4.6.
- · 1M context at mid-tier pricing
- · Fast enough for tight edit-test loops
- · Intro pricing makes it the cheapest serious coding model right now
- · Noticeably behind Opus/Fable on hard multi-step reasoning
- · New tokenizer changes token-count budgeting vs Sonnet 4.6
- · Routine feature work, tests, and refactors
- · High-volume parallel agent fleets where cost dominates
- · Fast iteration loops with human review
Claude Haiku 4.5
fastThe fast/cheap tier: sub-agents, classification, quick mechanical edits.
- · Cheapest Claude tier by far
- · Low latency, good for sub-agent fan-outs
- · Oldest model in the current lineup (Oct 2025)
- · 200k context, smallest window in the family
- · Not built for complex autonomous coding
- · Cheap sub-agents inside larger workflows
- · Lint-fix style mechanical changes
- · Summarization and triage
The frontier gap is real but narrow: per the swebench.com leaderboard, Fable 5 scores 95.0% on SWE-bench Verified against 88.6% for Opus 4.8, verified August 29, 2026. Whether those points are worth double the price depends entirely on the task, our full breakdown is on the Claude Fable 5 page.
Your AI workspace for shipping software.
Download AIDEN free and point it at your existing Claude Code or Codex setup. No credit card, running in minutes.
Download AIDEN freeFree to start · macOS 12+ · No credit card required
Decision guide: task shape → model
Genuinely hard or long-running → Fable 5
Serious everyday work → Opus 5
Routine tasks and volume → Sonnet 5
Subagents and mechanical edits → Haiku 4.5
The cost math makes the tiers concrete. Take a 2M-token agentic session, 1.6M tokens in, 0.4M out, typical for a meaty feature with a few test iterations, at list prices from Anthropic's published per-MTok rates:
| Model | List price | 2M-token session (1.6M in / 0.4M out) |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | $10 in / $50 out per MTok | $36.00 |
| Claude Opus 5 | $5 in / $25 out per MTok | $18.00 (Fast mode ~2.5x speed at twice the base price) |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | $5 in / $25 out per MTok | $18.00 (Fast mode $10/$50) |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | $3 in / $15 out per MTok | $10.80 (Intro pricing $2/$10 through Aug 31, 2026) |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | $1 in / $5 out per MTok | $3.60 |
Using them in Claude Code
Inside Claude Code, you switch models with the /model command, mid-session if you like, the new model inherits the conversation context:
/model opus # Opus 5, recommended default for complex agentic coding
/model sonnet # Sonnet 5, routine work and cost control
/model haiku # Haiku 4.5, subagents and quick edits
/model fable # Fable 5, requires Claude Code v2.1.170+
/model opusplan # Opus for plan mode, Sonnet for execution
/model best # highest tier your org has access to (Fable 5 if available)Three things about Fable 5 access worth knowing before you rely on it: it requires Claude Code v2.1.170 or later, it is not the default, you must select it explicitly, and it is unavailable under zero-data-retention agreements, so enterprise teams on ZDR contracts are capped at Opus 4.8 for now. The opusplan alias is the pragmatic middle path: flagship reasoning while you plan, workhorse pricing while the agent executes.
Mixing models across parallel agents
The per-task choice gets more interesting when you run agents in parallel: there is no reason every feature in flight should burn tokens at the same tier. Assign Fable 5 to the hard architecture feature, Sonnet 5 to the three routine ones, and let Haiku handle the subagent fan-outs inside each.
That is the workflow AIDEN, our macOS desktop app, is built around: it orchestrates your existing Claude Code CLI (and Codex, if you run both) on a kanban board, each feature with an approved spec, its own git worktree, and its own model assignment, local-first, on the keys you already pay for, free for one project. The manual version of this workflow, and where it breaks down, is covered in Claude Code orchestration; the cross-vendor picture lives in the AI models for coding hub.